Posts Tagged ‘muskmelon’

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Update – August 14, 2009

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

The weather continues to be very favorable for downy mildew. It is spreading now to hosts other than cucumber. Cantaloupe, watermelon, winter squash and pumpkin have all been infected in the region. The spots are much smaller on butternut squash and watermelon but still produce the small tuft of fungus growth on the underside of the leaf. All cucurbit growers need to be including a fungicide specific for downy mildew in their spray rotation such as Previcur Flex, Ranman, Presidio, or Tanos at this time. Follow the label directions for plant-back restrictions, mixing partners such as Bravo and mancozeb, and adjuvants. See the 2009 Commercial Vegetable Productions Recommendations for more information.

FDA Has Released Draft Food Safety Guidelines for Melons, Leafy Greens, and Tomatoes

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Gordon Johnson, Extension Ag Agent, Kent Co.; gcjohn@udel.edu

As part of the continued emphasis on improving produce food safety, the Food and Drug Administration has recently published draft guidance documents for reducing microbial food safety hazards in 3 crop groups – melons, tomatoes, and leafy greens. These publications are available for viewing at the FDA website at the following locations:
Melons
Tomatoes
Leafy Greens

The FDA is currently accepting public comments on these guidelines. The following are some excerpts:

Melons
FDA recommends:
● Conducting environmental assessments on the topography, land history, risk of flooding, adjacent land use, and domestic animal and wildlife presence associated with the production environment, using concepts that are outlined in the GAPs Guide (to the extent that any of these environmental factors are present).

● Monitoring and reducing, to the extent possible, domestic animal, wildlife, and insect activity in melon production environments that may contaminate water and soil with human pathogens and directly or indirectly contact melons, thereby increasing the risk of product contamination.

● Evaluating whether to harvest portions of melon fields when there is evidence of unusually heavy wildlife pest infestations (e.g., presence of wildlife feces, large areas of animal tracks, or burrowing).

● Training harvest employees to recognize and report signs and evidence of wildlife pest infestations (e.g., feces) and take appropriate actions.

● Delaying harvest and performing extra washing when heavy rains have recently occurred. Heavy rains may increase the likelihood of soil-to-melon contamination.

Multiple Melon Harvests
Multiple melon harvests may increase the likelihood of melon contamination due to increased wildlife and insect pressures because of the presence in the field of melons mechanically damaged during prior harvest operations.
FDA recommends:
● Training harvest employees to recognize and not harvest melons that have mechanical damage or possible contamination from previous harvest operations.

● Evaluating ways to reduce flying insect access, to the extent possible, to animal feces and other likely sources of human pathogens that may contaminate non-harvested melons in the field.

● Evaluating ways to dispose of culled melons which reduce the potential for melon culls to serve as animal and insect pest attractant. This will reduce the potential for insect/pest-to-melon fruit contamination.

Tomatoes
FDA recommends:
● Determining the previous usage of land. Assessing and mitigating conditions that may pose a food safety risk in and near production fields.

● Conducting an environmental assessment (e.g., considering topography, land history, near-by land use, and domestic animal and wildlife presence) including a consideration of the potential for flooding to create conditions that may pose a food safety risk.

● Locating tomato fields away from any area that may receive run-off or drainage from an animal operation or any other source of contamination that may pose a food safety risk.

● Avoiding, preventing, or minimizing run-off into the tomato field from any animal operation or other conditions that may pose a food safety risk.

● Avoiding the harvest of tomatoes in areas that have been contaminated by run-off from an animal operation or other potential source of contamination.

Tomato Equipment and Containers
FDA recommends:
● Cleaning and sanitizing any surface or equipment intended to contact fresh tomatoes (i.e., any food-contact surface), at a frequency sufficient to prevent the surface or equipment from becoming a source of contamination.

● Constructing reusable containers and food-contact equipment, and utensils of impervious materials that can be cleaned and sanitized.

● Checking any tomato containers that are received back from a packing house for cleanliness prior to use.

● Cleaning and sanitizing harvest containers, bins, food-contact equipment, and utensils at regular intervals during use (e.g., daily), or more often as needed, to remove sand, grit, dirt, and other residue.

● Establishing routine cleaning and sanitizing procedures (i.e., standard operating procedures).

● Maintaining all equipment and surfaces in such a way as to minimize the risk of contamination of, and injury to, tomatoes.

● Maintaining records of cleaning procedures and their implementation.

● Removing broken or damaged containers that are not easily cleanable from food contact use. If they are retained for other uses (e.g., trash), clearly marking them for their intended use.

Leafy Greens
FDA recommends:
● Conducting environmental assessments prior to the first seasonal planting, within one week prior to harvesting, and during harvesting operations.

● Assessing near-by land use and waterways for activities or conditions that may pose a risk of contamination such as livestock, wildlife, landfills, sewage treatment, chemical plants, or other conditions.

● Determining land history to identify microbial and chemical contamination from previous land use.

● Evaluating the risk to subsequent crop production on production acreage that has experienced recent postharvest grazing of domesticated animals.

● Evaluating production field locations and proximity to wildlife especially if the production field is isolated from other non-contiguous production areas.

● Evaluating whether heavy rains or irrigation practices may increase the likelihood of soil-to-leafy greens contamination.

Practices FDA recommends to reduce the risk of microbial contamination of leafy greens in the production environment include:

● Locating production sites (to the degree feasible) to minimize potential access by wildlife. For example, considering the proximity to water, wildlife harborage, open range lands, non-contiguous production lots or blocks, and urban centers.

● Controlling risks associated with production fields that are encroached upon by urban development.

● Considering risk factors including septic tank leaching and domestic animal fecal contamination of production fields and harvest equipment.

● Exercising care to reduce the potential for windborne soil, water or other media that may be sources of contamination to come into contact with the edible portions of leafy greens.

● Monitoring and minimizing domestic animal and wildlife activity in leafy greens fields and production environments (e.g., reducing potential harborage and standing water, and utilizing animal repellents and attractants).

● Considering whether or not to harvest any portions of a field affected by unusually heavy wildlife activity or evidence of wildlife activity (e.g., presence of wildlife feces).

● Assessing the field at the time of harvest to ensure that no new food safety risks have occurred.

● Using harvest practices such as removing outer soiled leaves and not harvesting whole soiled heads of leafy greens when excessive soil or mud builds up on leafy greens.

● Training harvest employees to recognize and report for appropriate action any evidence of wildlife activity or infestations (e.g., feces).

Water and Leafy Greens
Water used in production and harvest operations may contaminate leafy greens if it contains human pathogens and contacts edible portions of leafy greens or transmits pathogens by means of water-to-soil and soil-to-leafy greens contact. In addition, irrigation methods vary and each method may have varying potential to introduce human pathogens or promote human pathogen growth on leafy greens.
FDA recommends:
● Preparing a description of the irrigation water system. Using maps, photographs, drawings, or other means to communicate the location of permanent fixtures and the flow of the water system (including any water captured for re-use). Documenting permanent fixtures, including wells, gates, reservoirs, valves, returns and other above-ground features that make up a complete irrigation system, so as to enable location on the field. Documenting water sources and the production sites they may serve.

● Performing a sanitary survey prior to the use of water in agricultural operations to determine if the quality of water meets applicable State and local requirements, and then monitoring water quality with regular testing.

● Evaluating irrigation methods (e.g., drip irrigation, overhead sprinkler, and furrow) for their potential to introduce, support or promote the growth of human pathogens on leafy greens. Considering issues such as the potential for irrigation methods to deposit soil on the crop or cause pooled or standing water that attracts animals.

● Considering the impact of storm events on surface waters used to irrigate crops. Bacterial loads in surface water are generally much higher after a storm than normal and caution should be exercised when using these waters for irrigation.

● Considering the potential for pathogen contamination and growth when combining water from different sources (e.g., water systems that convey untreated human or animal waste should not be combined with conveyances used to deliver irrigation water).

● Storing irrigation pipes and drip tape in a manner that reduces potential pest infestations and developing procedures to ensure safe use of irrigation pipes and drip tape if a pest infestation does occur.

● Ensuring that water used on harvesting equipment or during harvesting is of appropriate microbial quality for its intended use. Testing the water source regularly to ensure that it is of appropriate microbial quality for its intended use.

● Evaluating risks of using reclaimed (primary or secondary) water, including use in operations such as road dust abatement. Reclaimed water may be subject to State and local requirements.

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Update – July 31, 2009

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

Downy mildew continues to occur in commercial pickling cucumber fields. It is now widespread in all three counties in home gardens as well as on both slicing and pickling cucumber varieties. So far it has only been found on cucumbers. Conditions continue to be favorable for downy mildew on all our cucurbits. Be sure to be including downy mildew fungicides such as Ranman, Previcur Flex, Tanos and Presidio for downy mildew control. They all need to be tank mixed with a protectant fungicide. Disease pressure is increasing and waiting until the three leaf stage may not provide the control desired if infected plantings are nearby. Check the website often for the latest forecast at http://cdm.ipmpipe.org.

Powdery Mildew on Cucurbits

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

Symptoms typically begin on older, lower leaves and can spread rapidly under dry, humid conditions. Control of powdery mildew begins with regular scouting for symptoms and weekly fungicide applications. Begin a fungicide program when PM has been found in the region and/or when 1 lesion is found on the underside of 45 leaves. Fungicide resistance management of the fungus which causes powdery mildew is critical in the Mid-Atlantic region! Fungicides with a high risk for resistance development, such as the strobilurin fungicides (Pristine, FRAC code 11) and Rally or Procure (FRAC code 3), should be tank mixed with a protectant fungicide such as chlorothalonil (M5) and rotated with fungicides of a different chemistry.

The following are some fungicide recommendations for control of powdery mildew in a variety of crops:

To control powdery mildew in pumpkin and winter squash:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
Micronized Wettable Sulfur (M2) at 4.0 lb 80W/A; Sulfur may injure plants especially at high temperatures. Certain varieties can be more sensitive. Consult label for precautions.
or
chlorothalonil plus Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A

If powdery mildew has become well established in the mid to late part of the season, only apply protectant fungicides such as chlorothalonil or sulfur or Quintec* (quinoxyfen, 13) at 6.0 oz 2.08F/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A.

*Quintec (quinoxyfen, FRAC code 13) from Dow AgroSciences has a section 3 supplemental label for powdery mildew control on pumpkin, winter squash and gourd. The label is available at http://www.rec.udel.edu/update09/Quintec.pdf.

To control powdery mildew in summer squash and cucumbers:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A,
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
chlorothalonil plus Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A

To control powdery mildew in muskmelon and watermelon:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
Quintec (quinoxyfen, 13) at 6.0 oz 2.08F/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

For more information on control of powdery mildew of cucurbits please see the Delaware Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations.

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Update – July 24, 2009

Friday, July 24th, 2009

 Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

Conditions continue to be favorable for downy mildew on all our cucurbits. Be sure to be including downy mildew fungicides such as Ranman, Previcur Flex, Tanos and Presidio for downy mildew control. They all need to be tank mixed with a protectant fungicide. Disease pressure is increasing and waiting until the three leaf stage may not provide the control desired if infected plantings are nearby. Check the website often for the latest forecast at http://cdm.ipmpipe.org.

High Populations of Striped Cucumber Beetle and Squash Bug this Year in Cucurbit Fields

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Jerry Brust, IPM Vegetable Specialist, University of Maryland; jbrust@umd.edu

This has been a particularly bad year for striped cucumber beetles and squash bugs in watermelon, pumpkin and squash. Some fields have been hit particularly hard with beetles causing 10-15% plant loss due just to their feeding. The biggest problem with these pests and why control sprays have not worked well is that they are consistently hiding in the plastic hole where they are feeding on the stem (Fig. 1). Sprayers are set up usually to cover a lot of leaf canopy and do not do a very good job of putting chemical down in the plant hole. This stem feeding can be severe enough that either pest alone could cause some wilting, but with both feeding on this relatively small area of the stem they are causing considerable damage (Fig. 2). In one case, when the pumpkin plant was pulled up 3 squash bugs refused to move off of it, so intense was their feeding (Fig. 3). It is hard enough to kill squash bug adults with a good cover spray, but when only small amounts of spray are reaching them down in the plant hole they will not be controlled. Often it is possible to walk by plants and even inspect them and still see no beetles or squash bugs, as they will stay down at the base of the plant and only move when the base is exposed. In one field 1 out of every 15 plants was wilting (Fig. 4) due to squash bug and cucumber beetle feeding. These pictures are from a pumpkin field but the same problem is occurring in watermelon fields with both striped cucumber beetles and squash bugs feeding on plants down in the plant hole. If this type of feeding is occurring in your fields, insecticide applications (pyrethroids such as Asana, Warrior, bifenthrin) must be directed down at the base of the plant.

cucumber beetle feedingFigure 1. Cucumber beetle feeding at base of plant in plastic hole

damage to pumpkin stem by cucumber beetle and squash bug feeding 

Figure 2. Severe feeding on pumpkin stem by striped cucumber beetle and squash bugs

squash bugs on a pumpkin stemFigure 3. Three squash bug adults refusing to relinquish their pumpkin stem

wilting plant damaged by cucumber beetle and squash bug feedingFigure 4. Wilted plant due to striped cucumber beetle and squash bug feeding at its base

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Update – July 17, 2009

Friday, July 17th, 2009

From: Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

So far down mildew has been found in Sussex County in the sentinel plot at the REC only on cucumber. Other detections in the region include southern NJ, MD, and Eastern Shore VA. The forecast on Wednesday indicates that there is a moderate risk of transport from eastern NC into the region on Thursday, July 16. Be sure to include a downy mildew fungicide in your spray program. Check the website often for the latest forecast at http://cdm.ipmpipe.org.

From: Kate Everts, Vegetable Pathologist, University of Delaware and University of Maryland; keverts@umd.edu

● Downy mildew on cucumber has been confirmed in Wicomico, Dorchester, Caroline, and Talbot Counties, MD and in Delaware.

● Downy mildew on zucchini squash in Prince Georges County, MD was confirmed July 10.

● Downy mildew on cantaloupe (muskmelon) was confirmed in Wicomico County, MD on July 14.

At this time targeted spray schedules for downy mildew should be applied on cucumber and cantaloupe (see the article titled Cucurbit Downy Mildew Found on the Eastern Shore of Maryland in WCU 17:17). Squash and pumpkin plantings should be scouted rigorously and treated with a protectant spray schedule (such as weekly applications of chlorothalonil). Once downy mildew is observed on the shore, switch to a targeted spray program.

Watermelons also should be scouted frequently and treated with a protectant fungicide schedule. The last (and closest) report of downy mildew on watermelon was on June 22 in Sampson County, NC. Downy mildew has not been observed on watermelon north of that location. When downy mildew is detected on watermelon in the Mid-Atlantic, a targeted fungicide program that includes one of the following: Presidio, Previcur Flex, Tanos, Gavel, or Curzate is warranted for watermelons.

Controlling Cucurbit Powdery Mildew

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Andy Wyenandt, Assistant Extension Specialist in Vegetable Pathology, Rutgers University; wyenandt@aesop.rutgers.edu 

Cucurbit powdery mildew(PM) season is just around the corner! Symptoms typically begin on older, lower leaves and can spread rapidly under dry, humid conditions.

Control of powdery mildew begins with regular scouting for symptoms and weekly fungicide applications. Begin a fungicide program when PM has been found in the region and/or when 1 lesion is found on the underside of 45 leaves. Fungicide resistance management of the fungus which causes powdery mildew is critical in the mid-Atlantic region! Fungicides with a high risk for resistance development, such as the strobilurin (Pristine, FRAC code 11) and Rally or Procure (FRAC code 3), should be tank mixed with a protectant fungicide such as chlorothalonil (M5) and rotated with fungicides of a different chemistry.

The following are some fungicide recommendations for control of powdery mildew in a variety of crops:

To control powdery mildew in pumpkin and winter squash:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
Micronized Wettable Sulfur (M2) at 4.0 lb 80W/A; Sulfur may injure plants especially at high temperatures. Certain varieties can be more sensitive. Consult label for precautions.
or
chlorothalonil plus Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A

If powdery mildew has become well established in the mid to late part of the season, only apply protectant fungicides such as chlorothalonil or sulfur.

To control powdery mildew in summer squash and cucumbers:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A,
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
chlorothalonil plus Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A

To control powdery mildew in muskmelon and watermelon:
Alternate:
Nova or Rally (myclobutanil, 3) at 5.0 oz 40WP/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Procure (triflumizole, 3) at 4.0-8.0 oz 50WS/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

With:
Quintec (quinoxyfen, 13) at 6.0 oz 2.08F/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A
or
Pristine (pyraclostrobin + boscalid, 11 + 7) at 12.5-18.5 oz 38WG/A plus chlorothalonil at 2.0-3.0 pt 6F/A

For more information on control of powdery mildew of cucurbits please see the Delaware Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations.

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Found on the Eastern Shore of Maryland

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Kate Everts, Vegetable Pathologist, University of Delaware and University of Maryland; keverts@umd.edu

Downy mildew on cucumber was confirmed on the Eastern Shore of Maryland on July 7, 2009. The processing cucumber scout that found the original infection reports that symptoms, but not sporulation, were present since June 30. The original field had been sprayed, which may have suppressed initial sporulation. There are many cucumber fields affected, which comprise approximately 300 acres. Therefore, all commercial cucumber growers should apply targeted fungicides for control of downy mildew.

The following are the most effective materials (always tank-mix these products with a protectant such as chlorothalonil at 1.5-3 pt 6F/A or OLF, or mancozeb at 3.0 lb 75DF/A):
● Ranman at 2.1-2.75 fl oz 400SC/A plus an adjuvant
● Presidio at 3.0-4.0 fl oz 4SC/A
● Previcur Flex at 1.2 pt 6F/A
● Tanos at 8.0 oz 50WDG/A
● Curzate at 3.2 oz 60DF/A

The NCSU forecasting website ranks these fungicides as follows:

Ranking of Efficacy for Fungicides to Control Downy Mildew

Fungicide

Activity Rating1

Presidio2

4.5

Ranman

4.5

Previcur Flex

3.5

Curzate

3

Gavel & mancozeb

2.5

Bravo

2

15 = excellent, 1 = low activity
2Presidio has plant back restrictions, so read the label carefully before selecting that product.

Growers of other cucurbit crops (pumpkin, muskmelon, squash, and watermelon) should aggressively scout their fields. In addition, they should be on a good standard maintenance program that includes chlorothalonil or mancozeb.

Fortunately the weather in the last several days has not been that favorable for long distance spread and survival of the spores. The forecast site states that the risk of downy is low through Thursday, July 9. Check the website often for the latest forecast at http://cdm.ipmpipe.org.

Phytophthora Fruit Rot on Cucurbits

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Bob Mulrooney, Extension Plant Pathologist; bobmul@udel.edu

As harvest approaches for some cucurbit crops and other plantings are beginning to flower this is the time to be planning controls if the crop is at risk from Phytophthora fruit blight. Although Gavel and Revus are not effective on cucumber downy mildew they do suppress Phytophthora fruit rot. To help suppress development, apply mefenoxam or metalaxyl at planting. The following materials will help provide suppression of the fruit rot phase only:

● Forum (dimethomorph, 40) at 6.0 fl oz 4.18SC/A – must be tank mixed with another fungicide active against Phytophthora blight on muskmelon, such as fixed copper

● Gavel (zoxamide + mancozeb, 22 + 3) at 1.5 to 2.0 lb 75DF/A (Note: some muskmelon cultivars are sensitive to Gavel)

● Tanos (famaxodone + cymoxanil, 11 + 27) at 8.0-10.0 oz 50DF/A

● Ranman (cyazofamid, 21) at 2.75 fl oz 400 SC/A plus an adjuvant, see label for details

● Presidio (fluopicolide, 43) 4.0 fl oz/A – plant back or rotation restrictions of 180 days for all crops other than cucurbits and fruiting vegetables. See label for details.

● Revus (was inadvertently omitted last week) (mandipropamid, 40) 8.0 fl oz/A – must be mixed with a fixed-copper fungicide.

phtophthoracucPhytophthora fruit rot on pickling cucumber

 phytophthorafruitrot1Phytophthora fruit rot of watermelon